Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:39 am
by lord_kungai
But still, the CPP is quite a good gun and a nice replacement/continuation of the Enforcer pistols.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:54 am
by jb
My idea of them would have been to replace the uber popular enforcers from the orignal UT. In fact the lastest tweaks have seem to get closer to that goal...

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:43 pm
by R.Flagg
I disagree. I don't think CPP is getting it done at all.

I still support complete removal.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:58 pm
by jb
R.Flagg wrote:I disagree. I don't think CPP is getting it done at all.
The headshot ability has been removed, some of the visual bug/tweaks have been made and its damge model is now very close to what the enforces were.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:12 pm
by Zachariah
I'd agree(with flagg) the cpp is something I avoid often.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:05 am
by Mætlöaff
It needs to be larger and meatier. The original enforcer made you feel like you could actually, y'know, enforce :P. I like the model and all, it's a real work of art, it just seems to look more like a camcorder than an actual weapon. It's too clean, too boot. The original enforcers were large, in charge, and quite grimy.

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:21 am
by TKATK
the original enforcers were instahit and had sparks on impact,not to mention had meatier sounds

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:55 pm
by Mætlöaff
How about we redo it based on the Dispersion Pistol?

:P

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:06 am
by lord_kungai
Mætlöaff wrote:How about we redo it based on the Dispersion Pistol?

:P
I LIKE THAT IDEA!!! :twisted:

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:01 pm
by Shadowstar
I dunno if copying a weapon is the best idea here. Just because we tried to do something new with it and failed, doesn't mean that its not a good idea to try to do something new with it. We just need to find that new idea that actually works. I'd like to try some things once we get some other more pressing issues sorted out first.